In a
recent study of pet foods, the FDA declared that, across all of the samples
tested, they found contamination almost exclusively in raw pet
foods, with one exceptional case in a dry cat food sample. Animal rights
activist Tambi Renee has taken a closer look at the study, however, and
concluded that there is something suspicious afoot over at the FDA. After
examining the time period during which the samples were taken, Tambi Renee
concluded that there was not a single raw pet food recall. Processed pet foods
did not fare so well.
Rather
than the single case of dry cat food contamination reported by the FDA, Tambi
Renee found that during the period of the study, the United States was faced with the
largest recall of pet kibble in its history due to salmonella contamination.
This recall, says Tambi Renee, affected numerous pet food brands, including
Diamond Dog and Cat Food, Natural Balance Dog and Cat Food, and several others.
Tambi
Renee thinks that clearly something is wrong with the numbers here, or the FDA
has found itself in an awful lot of confusion. As Tambi Renee points out,
either the FDA has failed to follow its own rules with regard to zero tolerance
for salmonella by not recalling those raw pet foods, or they did not, in fact,
inspect those pet foods cited in the study. Similarly, did they forget about
the massive pet food recall when tracking the statistics on pet kibble? Perhaps
there is some forgetfulness afoot, but more likely, says Tambi Renee, is
government blowback against raw food diets.